What does IGP provide?

A shared framework for different peace roles.

The framework lands differently in each role. For researchers it offers an ontological foundation; for organisations, a theory of change; for funders, a diagnostic lens; for policymakers, design criteria. The pages that follow set out each context.

Blueprint technical drawing of the framework

Select your stakeholder group.

How each stakeholder can use the framework.

The same framework supports different decisions depending on the role. These examples show the practical use case before the longer stakeholder pages.

Researcher example

Compare findings across peace traditions

A researcher can map a concept such as positive peace, feminist peace, or everyday peace against the shared elements, then show where it clarifies, extends, or challenges the wider field.

Organisation example

Show where programmes sit in a theory of change

An organisation can place mediation, training, advocacy, and community work on one structure so partners can see how separate activities contribute to the same outcome.

Funder example

Review a portfolio for gaps and overlap

A funder can map grants against Sentience, Relationality, and Wellbeing to identify where investments reinforce each other and where a missing component weakens the portfolio.

Policy example

Anchor a strategy in design criteria

A policymaker can use the framework to define what a peace strategy should protect, strengthen, and measure before choosing instruments or indicators.

Open a conversation about your work.